Harleyq86
read my profile
sign my guestbook

Visit Harleyq86's Xanga Site!

Name: K
Gender: Female


Interests: Been Better... My So Called Knife...
Occupation: Retired
Industry: Textiles


Message: message me


Member Since: 6/11/2006

SubscriptionsSites I Read
radewagon
Been_better_comic

Posting Calendar

|<< oldest | newest >>|
view all weblog archives

Get Involved!

Suggest a link

Recommend to friend

Create a site


Wednesday, November 05, 2008

I woke up this morning, with the feeling that the world is now a better place...


Friday, July 04, 2008

Jumper: Meh… entertaining I suppose, but ultimately I wouldn’t recommend it.

Bad Boys: Lots of fun!!! Will Smith can do no wrong.

Hancock: Awesome! I don’t know what’s gotten into all the critics but that movie is great! I think it just wasn’t what people were expecting, it’s not really what I was expecting but that is no reason to hate it. Idiots! All of them! It stands as further proof that Will Smith can do no wrong.

WALL-E: I love that movie! It was adorable with a good strong message. I’ve heard it said that it’s really an adult movie that kids would happen to enjoy, which I can understand. It’s not like a lot of kid’s movies; it’s grown up in a lot of ways including the love interest and the theme. This isn’t to say that it’s got adult content or anything because it really doesn’t. Take the kids, grandparents, neighbors, friends, classmates any one you can find and go see it!

You Don’t Mess With the Zohan: Good. Funny. Maybe trying too hard to make a point that people can get along and all that crap. Meh…

Wanted: Kick Ass! I had trouble getting through like the first ten minutes because the main character is such a whiney little bitch but once he gets over it the movie becomes a lot of fun! The action is completely outrageous and that’s part of what I love about it. Be prepared for exploding rats though.

The Orphanage: Really good, Ebert said it best when he called it a “superior ghost story” (said so on the front of the box). That’s really what it is too, just a damn good ghost story. Granted it tries to scare you a little, but that’s just because they’re ghosts. It’s a really really good story.

The Devil’s Backbone: Unlike the Orphanage which is merely “presented” (I have no idea what that means) by Guillermo del Toro, this one is written and directed by him. It’s really good and sort of explains why he “presented” the Orphanage because they are very similar. It has its moments and is ultimately worth seeing, but the Orphanage is better, I think.

Youth Without Youth: AWFUL. Rent this movie at your own risk. Don’t get me wrong, the directing is good (Francis Ford Coppola) and Tim Roth is no slouch, but it’s just not a good movie. The plot is unintelligible an the character is really just not that easy to empathize with. I’ve never walked out on a movie (not even Napoleon Dynamite), a fact that I’m quite proud of, but I found myself desperately wondering when it would end!

Sweeney Todd: Good, I guess. I think it would be a substantial amount better if it wasn’t a musical… though I can’t really envision it. While to a small extent I don’t understand why it got hyped up as much as it did I can totally see why it has a stupid annoying emo/goth kid following. All the ones that drool for Nightmare Before Christmas (which I do like quite a bit) I bet go ga-ga for this one. That’s probably why I didn’t like it as much as it probably deserves, I just know that all those stupid annoying ass people have put it up on a pedestal because it’s Tim Burton with Johnny Depp and he kills people to avenge his love blah blah blah hype hype hype GAG!

There Will Be Blood: Really really unbelievably amazing. That movie. Whoah, whoooh, that movie. I have trouble finding words. I was tired after watching it because it just draws you in like that! So. Damn. Good.


Friday, April 04, 2008

Guess Who Got Into UC Santa Barbara!

Oh yea! That's right! mmmm hmmm! You know it! Booya!

And I got a letter too! Not some lame ass email, oh no! It was a real letter too, with informative papers and everything! Not some lame ass would-be pop-up book letter *cough* UCR *cough*

I feel good...


Tuesday, March 25, 2008

BOOYA BITCHES

Wireless Telephone Laws FAQs

Q: When do the new wireless telephone laws take effect?
A: The new laws take effect July 1, 2008

Q: What if I need to use my telephone during an emergency, and I do not have a hands- free device?
A: The law allows a driver to use a wireless telephone to make emergency calls to a law enforcement agency, a medical provider, the fire department, or other emergency services agency.

Q: What are the fines(s) if I’m convicted?
A: The base fine for the FIRST offense is $20 and $50 for subsequent convictions. With the addition of penalty assessments, the fines can be more than triple the base fine amount.

Q: Will the conviction appear on my driving record?
A: Yes, but the violation point will not be added.

Q: Will there be a grace period when motorists will only get a warning?
A: No. The law becomes effective July 1, 2008. Whether a citation is issued is always at the discretion of the officer based upon his or her determination of the most appropriate remedy for the situation.

Q: Can I be pulled over by a law enforcement officer for using my handheld wireless telephone?
A: Yes. A law enforcement officer can pull you over just for this infraction.

Q: What if my phone has a push-to-talk feature, can I use that?
A: No. However, the law does provide an exception for those operating a commercial motor truck or truck tractor (excluding pickups), implements of husbandry, farm vehicle or tow truck, to use a two-way radio operated by a “push-to-talk” feature.

Q: What other exceptions are there?
A: Operators of an authorized emergency vehicle during the course of employment are exempt as are those motorists operating a vehicle on private property.

Check it out for yourself... http://www.dmv.ca.gov/cellularphonelaws/index.htm


Wednesday, March 19, 2008

I think I hate the internet. I’m terrified of checking my email. I don’t want to get an admission or rejection letter on my computer. I don’t want to read “You’ve been accepted” or “We regret to inform you” in the subject heading before I’ve even opened the letter. I want to receive an ambiguous letter in the mail addressed to me from a university with absolutely no hint to its content on the outside. I want that euphoric moment of uncertainty as I open it. Anything else just seems wrong, like I’ve been cheated.

This blows…



Next 5 >>